October 12, 2004Dear Friends & Family:
I know you are
busy--please, I beg you, to take time to read the following
articles and quotes. Read with an open mind.
We must be
informed, we must vote. It's not an option--it's a necessity.
A pivotal moment
for me was in the second debate when John Kerry said he would
not let personal beliefs dictate how he makes decisions. That
terrifies me.
|
Samuel
Adams
letter
to Elbridge Gerry, November 27, 1780
"If men of wisdom and knowledge, of moderation and
temperance, of patience, fortitude and perseverance,
of sobriety and true republican simplicity of
manners, of zeal for the honour of the Supreme Being
and the welfare of the commonwealth; if men
possessed of these other excellent qualities are
chosen to fill the seats of government, we may
expect that our affairs will rest on a solid and
permanent foundation."
|
|
Benjamin
Franklin
Motion for Prayers in the Constitutional
Convention, June 28, 1787
"I
have lived, Sir, a long time; and the longer I live, the
more convincing proofs I see of this Truth, that God
governs in the Affairs of Men. And if a Sparrow cannot
fall to the Ground without his Notice, is it probable
that an Empire can rise without his Aid?"
|
|
Philippians 2:14-15 (NASB)
"Do all things without grumbling or disputing; so
that you will prove yourselves to be blameless and
innocent, children of God above reproach in the
midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among
whom you appear as lights in the world."
|
|
President
John Quincy Adams
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone,
and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your
vote is never lost."
|
The following
important letter is a "must read" for all believers and was
signed by more than 70 Christian ministry leaders and
professors, including some who are very well known to us, such
as Dr. James Dobson, Don Hodel and H. B. London, Jr. of Focus on
the Family, Kerby Anderson of Probe Ministries, Jack and Kay
Arthur of Precepts Ministries, Gary Bauer of American Values,
Dr. David Jeremiah of Turning Point Ministries, Dr. Paige
Patterson of Southwestern Seminary {as well as numerous more
seminary presidents and professors], Bob Lepine and Dennis
Rainey of FamilyLife Ministries, Dr. Joseph M. Stowell III of
Moody Bible Institute, Donald E. Wildmon of American Family
Association, and Dr. Howard Hendricks of Dallas Seminary, to
name just a few. We hope you will pass this along to as many as
you can before the election.
|
The
Bible Speaks
to Several Ethical Issues in This Election
October 8, 2004
Many Americans seek guidance from the Bible for
important issues of life, while we recognize that
many others do not. With thankfulness for the
freedom of all Americans to believe whatever they
think best regarding matters of religion and ethics,
we offer this statement of our personal
understanding of the teachings of the Bible for the
thoughtful consideration of all who are interested
in how the Bible might speak to ethical issues in
the current election.
1. Supreme Court justices: People don't often
think of the appointment of Supreme Court Justices
as an ethical issue, but it clearly is now because
several decisions of the Supreme Court have imposed
on our nation new policies on major ethical and
religious questions.
A small majority of our current Supreme Court, and
lower courts that follow their example, have gone
beyond their Constitutionally defined task of
interpreting laws passed by Congress and state
legislatures, and have in effect created new "laws"
that have never been passed by any elected body. By
this process they have imposed on us decrees that
allow abortionists to murder unborn babies (contrary
to Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9, "you shall not
murder"), that protect pornographers who poison the
minds of children and adults (contrary to Exodus
20:17, "You shall not covet ... your neighbor's
wife; see also Matt. 5:28), that redefine marriage
to include homosexual couples (thus giving
governmental encouragement to actions that Romans
1:26-28 says are morally wrong), and that banish
prayer, God's name and God's laws from public places
(thus prohibiting free exercise of religion, and
violating Romans 13:3 which says that government
should be "not a terror to good conduct, but to
bad"). In taking to itself the right to decree such
policies, the Supreme Court has seriously distorted
the system of "checks and balances" intended by the
Constitution between the legislative, executive, and
judicial branches of government.
It is unlikely that any elected body such as a city
council, state legislature, or the U.S. Congress,
would have decreed policies like those mentioned
above, for such groups are accountable to the will
of the people. Not so the Supreme Court, which is
appointed for life. And democratically-elected
members of Congress and state legislatures are
helpless to change those Court-mandated policies
unless the makeup of the Supreme Court is changed.
We believe the ethical choice is for a President and
for U. S. Senators committed to appointing judges
who will follow the original intent of the
Constitution and just interpret law and not make it,
rather than for candidates who have often voted to
block such judges in votes in the Senate.
2. Defense against terrorists: A fundamental
responsibility of government is to "punish those who
do evil" (1 Pet. 2:14) and thus to protect its
citizens. We now face a unique challenge, because
terrorists who will sacrifice their own lives in
killing others cannot be deterred by the usual
threat of punishing a criminal after he commits a
crime. While Jesus instructed individuals not to
seek personal revenge but to turn the other cheek
(Matt. 5:39), the Bible teaches that governments are
responsible to "bear the sword" (Rom. 13:4) and thus
to use force to oppose violent evil. We believe the
ethical choice is for a candidate who will pursue
terrorists and, when necessary, use force to stop
them before they strike us, not for a candidate who
only promises to respond if we are attacked again.
3. Abortion: The Bible views the unborn child
as a human person who should be protected, since
David said to God, "You knitted me together in my
mother's womb" (Psalm 139:13; see also Psalm 51:5;
139:13; Luke 1:44), and strong penalties were
imposed for endangering or harming the life of an
unborn child (Exod. 21:22-23). We believe the
ethical choice is for candidates who believe
government should give protection to the lives of
unborn children, not ones who believe government
should allow people to choose to murder their unborn
children if they wish.
4. Homosexual marriage: The Bible views
marriage as between one man and one woman, for "a
man shall leave his father and his mother and hold
fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh"
(Gen. 2:24; Eph. 5:31). Because our courts have
shown a troubling tendency to overturn the laws that
have already been passed concerning marriage, we
believe the ethical choice is for candidates who
support a Constitutional amendment defining marriage
as between one man and one woman.
5. Embryonic stem cell research : Creating
more human embryos for their stem cells is making
the beginnings of little babies for the purpose of
harvesting their parts, contrary to the command,
"You shall not murder" (Exod. 20:13). There is a
good alternative: using adult stem cells for medical
research, because this does not destroy the life of
the adult whose cells are used. We believe the
ethical choice is for a candidate who has decided he
will not allow government funds to be spent to
create more human embryos just to take their stem
cells.
6. Natural resources: God put human beings on
the earth to "subdue it" and to "have dominion" over
the animals (Gen. 1:28). We value the beauty of the
natural world which God created, and we believe that
we are called to be responsible stewards who protect
God's creation while we use it wisely and also seek
to safeguard its usefulness for future generations.
The Bible does not view "untouched nature" as the
ideal state of the earth, but expects human beings
to develop and use the earth's resources wisely for
mankind's needs (Gen. 1:28; 2:15; 9:3; 1 Tim. 4:4).
In fact, we believe that public policy based on the
idealism of "untouched nature" hinders wise
development of the earth's resources and thus
contributes to famine, starvation, disease, and
death among the poor. We believe the ethical choice
is for candidates who will allow resources to be
developed and used wisely, not for candidates
indebted to environmental theories that oppose
nearly all economic development in our nation and
around the world.
7. Should Christians speak out and try to
influence our nation on these issues? God's
people in the Bible often spoke about ethical issues
to government rulers. Daniel told the Babylonian
king Nebuchadnezzar to practice "righteousness" and
to show "mercy to the oppressed" (Dan. 4:27);
several Old Testament prophets speak to foreign
nations about their sins (Isaiah 13-23; Ezekiel
25-32, Amos 1-2, Obadiah (to Edom), Jonah (to
Nineveh), Nahum (to Nineveh), Habakkuk 2, Zephaniah
2); and Paul spoke to the Roman governor Felix
"about righteousness and self-control and the coming
judgment" (Acts 24:25).
As Christian leaders we agree that the primary
message of the New Testament is the good news about
salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. But the
primary message is not the whole message, and
another significant part of the New Testament
teaches us how people should live. With respect to
issues like these we have mentioned, the Bible also
teaches us about what kinds of laws governments
should have.
The laws of a nation have a significant influence on
the nation's moral climate, for good or for ill.
This is because laws can either restrain evil or
encourage it, and because laws also have a teaching
function as they inform people about what a
government thinks to be right and wrong conduct.
Therefore we urge pastors and Bible study leaders to
teach on these crucial ethical issues facing our
nation. We urge all Christians that they have a
moral obligation to learn about the candidates'
positions, to be informed, and to vote. We urge all
Christians to pray that truthful speech and right
conduct on both sides would prevail in this
election. We also encourage Christians to consider
doing even more for the good of our nation, such as
giving time or money, or talking to friends and
neighbors, or even serving in office themselves.
Such influence for good on the direction of our
country is one important way of fulfilling Jesus'
command, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself"
(Matt. 22:19). |
|